Yet again the government is cracking down on its own people, including house-to-house inspections, and bans of pet sites on the net. Quote: Strict Chinese regulations could cost pet owners their best friend Source: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006 ... edog_x.htm, emphasis mine.
By Calum MacLeod, USA TODAY BEIJING — China already is famous for its one-child policy, which Beijing says has curbed population growth that could stop the nation from growing rich. Now, in the Year of the Dog, the Chinese capital is enforcing a one-dog policy. The goal: to curb a pet boom among people whose bourgeois lifestyles would horrify Chairman Mao, the Communist leader who banned pets for decades. Waving banners and screaming, "Stop the slaughter!" more than 200 young Chinese, fearful that their animals will be killed, gathered in Beijing on Saturday. Protesters stage a rally Saturday against the new "one-dog policy" in Beijing. Only one pet dog is allowed per household in nine zones, and anyone keeping an unlicensed dog will face prosecution. The noisy but peaceful demonstration also attracted at least 200 police officers, some in riot gear. The police detained and later released at least 15 people. Regulations issued last week limit each Beijing household to one dog, prohibit owners from taking them to parks or other public areas and reinforce the ban on large dogs — any animal with a shoulder height above 14 inches. The official reasons are public safety and disease control: Rabies fatalities leapt 30% in the first nine months of 2006. Rabies became the nation's top infectious- disease killer, ahead of tuberculosis and AIDS, according to the Ministry of Health. "Anyone breaking the rules will be punished," the Nov. 6 order warns. For the owners of the 550,000 dogs registered with the city and the more than 450,000 the Beijing Association for Small Animal Protection says are unregistered, the fear of prosecution pales beside their pets' likely fate: detention or even execution, right before their eyes. "The police started house-to-house searches this month," said Zhang Li, 24, who was at the protest Saturday outside the Beijing Zoo. Her husky exceeds the height rule. "I'm so worried, I can't work or live normally. The police could kill him on the spot." Protests are rare in China's tightly policed capital. One reason is that urbanites have profited the most from the nation's free-market revolution. Now, these young professionals want to protect their newly won affluence, lifestyles and rights. "Dogs are humanity's friends. These regulations are infringing our human rights," Zhang said. The public dissent this weekend is only the campaign's opening salvo, protesters said. They spread word about the demonstration through the Internet, even though the government blocked some pet websites in recent days in response to their opposition to the rules. "There will be more protests like this," promised Xu Chun, 25, a software programmer. Xu will walk Silly, his Old English sheepdog, only after 10 p.m. to avoid the police and informers, who receive cash rewards from police hotlines if they turn in a big or unlicensed dog. "We want the leaders to know we are not happy and that they must revise these unreasonable rules," he said. "Many larger dogs are not dangerous at all." Happy, a 9-year-old Pekingese lap dog, is neither big nor dangerous. "He went blind four years ago, but I can't bear to put him down," said Zuo Cheng, 54. Zuo fell in love with dogs when she was sent from Beijing to labor in the countryside during Mao's Cultural Revolution. "I had a 'pig dog,' a sheepdog that helped me look after the pigs," she recalled. When dog ownership rebounded in the 1990s, Zuo bought Happy and kept her a secret at first. This year, Zuo took in three strays. What will happen to Happy's friends, given the new one-dog rule? "Perhaps the police will give them to other people," Zuo said hopefully. "Nonsense," replied her husband, Li Xiaobing, 53. "They will be destroyed." I wish oes.org could help somehow. Any ideas? |
|
I heard this on Oprah and felt terrible. Some people are truly ruthless. |
Ron wrote: I wish oes.org could help somehow. Any ideas?
PRAYER Pam |
Very sad, feel for those people that have dogs and all that is happening.
Not much you can do, they do it to their people with allowing only 1 child per couple, now dogs too. And large dog breeds, poor things As Pam said "PRAYER" and hope things change eventually there for people and animals. |
I don't understand why they don't just vaccinate for rabies? Instead of killing dogs, enforce vaccination laws.
There is no reasoning with a communist government though IMO. |
Poor people of China... |
It is very sad... I agree with stace, why they can't enforce the vaccination laws is beyond me. This is a common, and reasonably affordable vaccination.
As a citizen of a nother countryI'm not sure there is much I personally can do... I wonder if writing our congresspeople and encouraging them to speak with the chinese government about this issue would help? Are there any international pet owner advocacy groups? |
Maybe they don't want to have to import food for dogs; they used to have enough trouble feeding their people.... but who knows. That wouldn't explain the ban on parks. |
I'm saddened by this, especially as it will lead to the deaths of thousands of dogs. When China originally enforced it's one-child policy I believe it went into effect with future children, not with families who already had two +. It sounds like with the one-dog policy they will just take away and kill any dog who doesn't meet the standard, even if the owners can prove that the dogs were there before the policy went into effect. It makes me so sad. |
This really bothers me. I really admire those folks who had the guts to protest. That means a lot in that society. I wish I knew what to do to help.
I just e-mailed a work associate in Bejing who has three dogs. I want to hear his take on this issue. |
Send this link: http://www.oes.org/page2/10911~Another_ ... ijing.html |
Government does what government wants to do UNLESS the people stand up for what's RIGHT.
There are more than those that attened the demonstration that feel the same way, but for reasons of their own, they remain silent. Not just there, but everywhere! The US is a good example of government control with no reguards to what the majority wants. Happening right before our eyes. What's being done? Not much. What we can do is make sure its not allowed to happen here. It's already started, but its so gradual no one takes notice until it gets out of hand, as in China. The blessing in all of this is the fact that we at least know these critters will be just outside the gates of Heaven, being taken care of far better than we can begin to imagine, and will no longer suffer from mans lack of caring, responsibility, etc......... (Speaking only of those doing this, not the innocent victims of such foolishness). Mouthypf |
Anonymous wrote: The US is a good example of government control with no reguards to what the majority wants. Happening right before our eyes. What's being done? Not much. Maybe on some issues that don't rise to the level of "something important enough to do something about", but how can you say that after the recent elections? The majority (rightly or wrongly) has been clamoring for a change in direction that the leadership hadn't been listening to, so the public threw them out. So I must disagree strongly with your blanket statement.
As it regards animal rights vs. owner rights, "the majority" on the issue are the animal rights people because they are the ones who make their desires known, using a divide and conquer approach towards incremental gain, which is quite effective. Not many people out there to protest against oes docking legislation. Not many people to protest Doberman ear clipping. So they go after the breeds one by one until the global rules are a fait accompli. |
I really don't know what to say. This is so horrible.
Maybe it's going to take a certain issue for their people to revolt. It is their country and their choice as to how to live in their country. And what rule to live under. To me some issues are worth dying for and I only know what I would do if faced with that, but thankful I am not in that position and I hope those that are living there and walk in those shoes make decisions they can live with. If there's something we can do in addition to prayer I'd like to know. |
Ron wrote: .......Maybe on some issues that don't rise to the level of "something important enough to do something about", but how can you say that after the recent elections? The majority (rightly or wrongly) has been clamoring for a change in direction that the leadership hadn't been listening to, so the public threw them out. So I must disagree strongly with your blanket statement.
That's what I meant, "that the leadership hadn't been listening". Yes, in the election the majority (at least of those that voted) was heard. But, that shouldn't be the only time they listen to the "majority". I think they should continue to listen to the majority between elections. As far as the animals rights people - divide and conquer. You're absolutely right. |
Their government is trying to relax and reform, I really believe that. Whether they can successfully reform, and into what they might reform are other questions. They are missing the basic piece, which is that their people have rights which aren't being respected.
I think that Tiananmen Square was a huge wake-up call to their party, but expecting a totalitarian regime to become democratic I think is unlikely, so there will continue to be abuses such as this. |
Here's an article from Yahoo--citizens hiding their dogs
due to crackdown Quote: BEIJING - Elaine Loke is shutting down her dog boutique and will spirit her golden retrievers Hippy and Bally out of Beijing to escape the city's sweeping anti-rabies campaign.
Dog owners like Loke have been scrambling to hide their pets in the face of a new crackdown which allows only one dog per household and bans breeds taller than 14 inches. Fears have been fueled by graphic Internet pictures and witnesses who say police are beating to death strays and dogs that run afoul of regulations. "I can't believe this is happening," said Loke, 33, who keeps the curtains in her first-floor apartment drawn to ward off prying neighbors and walks her dogs in an underground parking lot. "It's so stressful. In the morning, I hear dogs barking and people talking outside my home and I think the police are coming." The pressure is so bad that Loke is returning to her native Hong Kong and closing a business she has had for two years. In China, dogs have long been seen as a source of meat as much as companionship. But the current crackdown has touched a nerve in the rapidly modernizing capital, especially among its burgeoning middle class. "What kind of rules are these? I don't expect everybody to love animals. But I do want to have my rights to keep pets," said Clare Xiao, an account manager at an advertising company. She sent her larger Brittany to a kennel run by a friend and kept her Pekinese, a stray she found on the street. "What the government is doing is just disappointing, cold and emotionless," said Xiao. Many of the prohibitions have been on the books since 2003, but only sporadically enforced. The city of 13 million people has 1 million dogs, half of them unregistered, according to state media. A sharp increase in rabies cases nationwide has prompted the renewed vigilance. Only 3 percent of China's dog's are vaccinated against rabies and the disease is nearly always fatal in humans once symptoms develop, though it can be warded off by a series of expensive and painful injections. Officials have extended the 2003 rules to cover not only Beijing's center but some outlying areas. The clampdown, announced Nov. 6, gave owners until Thursday to comply or the dogs would be seized and the owners fined. One owner Zhu Qiao has moved three times since 2001 to find areas where her black-and-white dog, Gou Gou, could be raised safely and within the law. "He's part of my life, he's my friend and family," said Zhu, 30, a television producer. "If you want to impose a law, you have to get the opinion of dog owners and experts. You can't just take them away." "I can't move again. There's no option but to hide him and if he gets taken, I'll go with him." Another owner had his Labrador retriever taken away Wednesday because she was too big. "She is a very amicable dog. She never barked," said the owner, a businessman who would give only his surname Yang. "If they don't allow me to raise her here, I will find another place. I will get her back." Witness accounts and photos on the Internet have shown dogs being captured in nets and pummeled with wooden and metal sticks. But authorities have vowed to carry out a "strict but civilized" campaign that police hoped would not anger dog owners, according to the official Xinhua News Agency. "I have never heard of dogs being culled after they were caught by police. Dogs are a man's best friend and we treat them as friends, even when we have to lock them up for the sake of public security," Xinhua quoted a Ministry of Public Security official, Bao Suixian, as saying. Many owners have sent their dogs to kennels outside the city. Some are handing them over to friends and family. Joyce Wang gave one of her dogs to her sister and is keeping Ding Ding, her fox terrier, close by her side. She said she had heard that the government was offering $25 to people who reported on rule-breaking dog owners. "I'm scared and worried. Now I don't take him outside during the day," Wang said. "Even in the evening, we will take a detour if we see people in the compound we live in." http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061115/ap_ ... on_the_run Zahra |
That's AWFUL! There's enough people in that country to where they should group together and take a stand against this. |
I just heard a very sad interview on NPR this mroning. A woman who owns a OES in Beijing talking about having to hide her dog because he was over the 14 inch height restrictin. The police actually came beating on her door because someone reported that she had an "oversized" dog. |
This is so heartbreaking.
I never got a response from my co-worker in Beijing regarding his dogs. In the past, he has frequently commented on Big Brother censoring/monitoring e-mails and websites visited. So, I feel sure he was protecting them by saying nothing. Now I feel bad for even asking about them. I hope I didn't give the authoirites info that didn't already have. |
The member "Arthur" from China posted a link for a forum in China a while back, the link is not working now, looks like they have closed that one down.
It was in chinese and had lots of people on it with there dogs and quite a few OES as well. Here is the link he has posted, I can't get it to load can anyone else? http://www.chinapet.net/bbs/viewforum.php?f=129 What a terrible situation for them all, I can not for the life of me believe they even got the honour to hold the Olympic games in 2008. |
Well, the domain is still there and taking requests, but returning an error about the database connection routines. We'll have to try back later. |
The link is working now... I wish I could read chinese... |
So do I, I do notice by the pictures all the larger breed of dogs, I wonder if they are going to be safe from this crack down.
I wonder if Ron could PM or e-mail "Arthur" as Admin of this forum and ask if everyones dogs are safe. Quite a few OES on this China pet Forum. |
Wow... This is tough on pet lovers in China.
Best we can do is let everyone know about this situation and raise attention to this issue. The more people get upset the more attention we will draw to humane rights associations, and I'm sure GreenPeace and PETA are already thinking about doing something. |
Didn't find exactly what you're looking for? Search again here:
Custom Search
|
| |
|
|
|